Jtest: Java Static Analysis, Code Review, Unit Testing, Security
, May 2012 - 225 KB PDF
This data sheet introduces Parasoft Jtest , an integrated Java testing toolkit for static code analysis, code review, automated unit and component testing, coverage analysis, runtime error detection, and regression testing.
Data Sheet
|
 |
White Paper
|
 |
Article
|
 |
Data Sheet
|
 |
Code Coverage Awareness
, September 2011
Introduces steps for improving code coverage awareness: tools for measuring coverage; understanding the type of coverage provided; identifying and covering uncovered cases.
Blog
|
 |
C/C++test: C/C++ Static Analysis, Code Review, Unit Testing, Security
, September 2011 - 883 KB PDF
This data sheet introduces Parasoft C/C++test, an integrated C and C++ testing toolkit for static code analysis, code review, automated unit and component testing, coverage analysis, runtime error detection, and regression testing.
Data Sheet
|
 |
Code Coverage Density and Test Overlap
, September 2011
Explains why test overlap is generally undesirable, introduces test overlap and the imperfection of coverage models, and explores how to achieve properly distributed test density.
Blog
|
 |
Blog
|
 |
The Problem with Path Code Coverage
, August 2011
Discusses why so few available code coverage analysis tools support path coverage: high number of paths, difficulty identifying and covering paths, representation challenges.
Blog
|
 |
Test Code Coverage Metrics
, August 2011
Explores code coverage metrics including statement coverage (block coverage), branch coverage, and path coverage.
Blog
|
 |
Code Coverage Granularity
, August 2011
Explains what coverage granularity means, why line-based coverage is meaningless yet popular, and granularity levels for test coverage (line, statements/expression, bytecode instruction).
Blog
|
 |
Dispelling Common Code Coverage Myths and Dodging Pitfalls
, August 2011
Introduces common pitfalls and misconceptions regarding code coverage granularity, coverage criteria, coverage density, and test overlap, then it explains what you need to know to choose the best coverage metric for your goals.
Blog
|
 |
Coverage Analysis
, July 2011
Introduces Parasoft's coverage analysis capabilities (test coverage for unit testing, integration testing, system testing).
Web Page
|
 |
dotTEST: .NET Testing and Analysis
, May 2011
Introduces how dotTEST simplifies static analysis, code review, unit testing for
languages that target the Microsoft .NET Framework and .NET Compact Framework, including C#, VB.NET, and MC++ (Managed C++).
Web Page
|
 |
C/C++test: C/C++ Testing and Analysis
, May 2011
Introduces how C/C++test simplifies static analysis, code review, unit testing, and runtime error detection for embedded and enterprise development.
Web Page
|
 |
Jtest: Java Testing and Analysis
, May 2011
Introduces how Parasoft Jtest simplifies Java static analysis, code review, unit testing, and runtime error detection.
Web Page
|
 |
Unit Testing: Is More Coverage Better?
, April 2011
Argues that greater unit testing code coverage is not always better. Also discusses what you can learn by reviewing unit test code coverage.
Blog
|
 |
Video
|
 |
Unit Testing Starter Kit
, March 2011
This 20-page eKit provides practical tips on how adopt unit testing without all the traditional hasslesso you can obtain real value from unit testing.
Guide/Kit
|
 |
Understand and Optimize Code Coverage eBook
, December 2010
This 20-page Code Coverage Guide introduces common pitfalls and misconceptions regarding code coverage granularity, coverage criteria, coverage density, and test overlap, then it explains what you need to know to choose the best coverage metric for your goals.
White Paper
|
 |
White Paper
|
 |
Wipro Case Study
, September 2010 - 575 KB PDF
To remain competitive, Wipro needed a more efficient and cost-effective way to maintain the exceptional quality standards that they pride themselves on. Find out how an automated testing infrastructure helped them achieve their quality objectives while reducing testing time and effort by 25%.
TAGS: Case Study, C/C++test, Jtest, dotTest, C, C++, Java, Automated Infrastructure, Code Review, Coverage Analysis, Geographically-Distributed, Static Analysis, Unit Testing
Case Study
|
 |
Trane Case Study
, February 2010 - 86 KB PDF
Trane decided to migrate their legacy systems to C++ and .NET to enable more rapid and agile responses to business demands. Discover how Parasoft reduced the learning curve, helped them ensure code met uniform expectations around reliability, performance, and maintainability, and helped them achieve nearly 100% coverage on unit tests.
Case Study
|
 |
White Paper
|
 |
Unit Testing Best Practices
, July 2009
Explains how unit testing can help your team rapidly modify code with confidenceand how to get started as painlessly as possible.
White Paper
|
 |
Intermoco Case Study
, September 2008 - 721 KB PDF
Intermoco's engineering organization is responsible for both the "server side" (or database) activities associated with its network operations center as well as "embedded" solutions associated with metering and communication units in the field. Learn how Parasoft helped them double testing coverage, reducing the risk of inaccurate reporting and unit failures in the field.
Case Study
|
 |
Cover Yourself in Java
, Software Test & Performance, June 2008
Explains the basic notions of Java test coverage and discusses some of the common pitfalls and misconceptions.
Article
|
 |
Enventive Case Study
, January 2006 - 665 KB PDF
Most of Enventive's products must comply with a design for Six Sigma development process and meet a five nines (99.999%) reliability standard. Discover how Parasoft helped them move towards their goal of 100% crash-free codeand also implemented best practices that enable them to spend more time creating new capabilities.
Case Study
|
|
|